Establishing a metastasis is not easy for a tumour cell. In order to survive the journey through the bloodstream or lymphatic vessels, it must change its phenotype and then find an energetically favourable site where it can survive and begin to grow. Once, however, it does happen and the tumour establishes secondary loci, treatment options become dramatically more difficult. And although the concept of preventing tumour cells from moving is not entirely new, it has only been developed in recent years. “A range of commonly used antitumour drugs such as cisplatin affect, for example, cell stiffness, which also influences their movement. But science only turned its attention to migrastatics as specific compounds that prevent cells from moving relatively recently,” says Masařík. Moreover, although specifically cisplatin has migrastatic potential, at higher concentrations it is already toxic not only to tumour cells but also to healthy ones, which in patients can manifest a number of adverse side-effects.
The principle of migrastatic therapy, on the other hand, lies only in restraining tumour cells within the tumour, not killing them by exposure to cytotoxic stress, which can negatively affect healthy surrounding cells as well. Suitable candidates for migrastatic drugs can also be sought among drugs already officially approved for the treatment of other diseases. Among them is, for example, metformin – a diabetes drug for which migrastatic effects have already been proven in the past, especially when used in the early stage of the disease. “That supports its potential for new use. And because it has already undergone testing and screening, it would be easier to get it to patients,” notes Kateřina Hönigová, according to whom migrastatic therapy alone may find potential application, for example, just before surgical procedures associated with the risk of tumour cell release into the bloodstream. But by itself it will not reduce or destroy the tumour.
Expose, destroy and strengthen
That is why scientists propose a concept in which migrastatic therapy is complemented by the other two pillars – photodynamic therapy and intratumoural immunotherapy. “Probably no therapy can be used universally and it is always good to target several key features of tumour cells. That is why we propose how these three approaches could hypothetically work in synergy and how they could complement each other,” says Hönigová, adding that each of them faces its own challenges in development. “Photodynamic therapy is today certainly further on than the migrastatic one. Drugs such as the commercial preparation Photofrin are already approved and used, for example, in skin tumours or head and neck tumours. Likewise, several intratumoural drugs are in clinical testing phases.”
Scientists are also focusing on finding such compounds that would be capable of merging at least two approaches, with the lowest risk of side-effects for the patient. In cooperation with medicinal chemists from the First Faculty of Medicine of Charles University they are thus testing in Brno at the workplace of Masaryk University structures that have both a migrastatic effect and in which photosensitisers are integrated, thus making them capable of acting also as photosensitisers, i.e., substances activated by the action of light, capable of directly killing tumour cells. The advantage is that these substances respond to light of a certain wavelength and are active only locally, at the illuminated site. They are therefore not toxic to their surroundings and to healthy cells.
Similarly locally functioning is also the third pillar of the proposed therapeutic concept: intratumoural immunotherapy, which is intended to support the local immune response and, in the wider context, the entire immune system through maintaining memory cells, which prevent recurrence, that is the tumour returning. “If the tumour returns in the form of recurrent cells, then a therapy that worked on the original tumour often no longer works on these recurrent cells,” explains the importance of maintaining and strengthening immune memory Kateřina Hönigová. “On the contrary, it has already been tested in mice that if the immune system’s memory was sufficiently strengthened by a specific type of intratumoural immunotherapy, then in individuals to whom tumours were applied again, they did not grow any more.”
As Michal Masařík reminds us, scientists no longer rely only on theoretical data but also on a range of experimentally confirmed studies, including toxicity studies of the tested compounds. Thanks to the grant project of the Czech Science Foundation they can currently focus on describing the detailed effect of new methinium salt derivatives, whose newly discovered migrastatic potential they are testing, and further develop the “triple attack” concept. “It is a puzzle that is beginning to gradually take shape,” says Hönigová and welcomes the broader interest of the scientific community, thanks to which research in the area of migrastatics is being developed. “The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved a few years ago metastasis-free survival as a primary endpoint in clinical trials focused on prostate carcinoma. That means that in the tested drugs today they evaluate also how much they can prevent metastatic spread. Thanks to that, migrastatic therapy may be advanced in development and approval of drugs. It is a big success that the community engaged in the development of experimental migrastatic drugs has managed to achieve.” And so let us just add: with no small contribution from Czech scientists…